Custom Text


Community Reacts, Senator Creighton Responds to Jones State Forest Bill

By  | 

Texas Senate Bill 1964 is receiving much attention recently from the community, with Hello Woodlands receiving messages from concerned residents about new possible development in William Goodrich Jones State Forest.

Owned by The Texas A&M University System, Jones State Forest consists of approximately 1,733 acres in Montgomery County that hosts a large population of the red-cockaded woodpecker, a federally listed endangered species, and receives over 100,000 visitors annually who attend the signature environmental outdoor learning classrooms. Learn more and view map here.

W. Goodrich Jones State Forest

Photo: Trail Map of W. Goodrich Jones State Forest, Source: Texas A&M Forest Service

The bill introduced by Senator Brandon Creighton on March 10, 2017 relates to “the use of land in Jones State Forest for academic and economic purposes” where “the board may use or lease land in Jones State Forest for the construction of buildings or improvements for multipurpose uses, including academic, research, and private commercial uses, when in its judgment it is advantageous to the state to do so.” Read the bill here.

Hello Woodlands reached out to Senator Creighton for a statement and received the following response on March 27, 2017:

Dear Senate District 4,

On March 10th, I filed Senate Bill 1964 relating to the Jones State Forest at the request of the Texas A&M University System. Since that time, I have heard from many constituents and stakeholders and I would like to clarify the intent of the bill.

Texas A&M has owned this treasured asset since the 1920’s for the purpose of education. Tommy Williams, Former Senate District 4 Senator and current Vice Chancellor of Texas A&M, requested on behalf of the University that I file a bill to allow a public conversation to be held in the State Legislature. I am asking for a hearing to discuss the merits of the University’s request to use between 5-10% of the Jones State Forest (southern end near State Highway 242) for educational purposes.

During the five months of a Legislative Session, my office listens, discusses, and studies suggested state policy. We work hard to advance good policy and many times table policy suggestions that require more consideration.

This is a Texas A&M request for Texas A&M use within a Texas A&M asset. Whether or not the University uses a portion of the forest should be a public discussion. My intent with Senate Bill 1964 was to honor the request to begin this conversation.

As an 8th generation Montgomery County resident, I cherish the big thicket, natural timberland and foliage, including the wildlife that occupies the forest. I am not interested in clearing the forest or destroying any wildlife.

As for the conversation, please provide me with your viewpoints. When I became a Legislator, I took an oath to represent all of my constituents and put their needs above my own. I take this oath very seriously. My job as a Legislator is to balance many requests and to help decide what is best for Senate District 4.

I’m listening,

Brandon Creighton

On March 26, 2017, residents launched a petition that has received over 3,000 electronic signatures and will be sent to Senator Creighton if 5,000 signatures are obtained. A website and Facebook group are also live, linking to the petition plus providing information and support to concerned members of the community.

Read the NEW update from Senator Creighton here.

What are your thoughts on Texas Senate Bill 1964? Share your comments with Hello Woodlands and stay tuned for more updates!

Caffe di Fiore Menu April 6 to 10


  1. Elsa Ward

    March 27, 2017 at 8:12 PM

    That would make perfect sense, but for the Bill’s own language, which also includes “private commercial uses.” Please offer to strike that language in its entirety from the Bill, Senator. Thank you.

  2. Robert Stevens

    March 27, 2017 at 9:58 PM

    The Woodlands has continued to clear more and more natural forest and force wildlife to relocate. Build the education center at or near the forest office where it’a already cleared or where trees have been thinned out (north side). Why tear down more natural forest? This contradicts preservation and wildlife protection/management.

  3. Yann

    March 28, 2017 at 7:55 AM

    The bill does not reflect what the senator is saying in response to the challenge. His statement is made up. That, combined with the fact that he is the VP and general counsel for Signorelli company, a Conroe based construction company, implies misuse of his public position.

  4. Helen

    March 28, 2017 at 8:41 AM


  5. Bill

    March 28, 2017 at 2:22 PM

    I could not agree more. It would be a shame as fast as the county is growing to allow “private commercial development”. There is too much developer greed as it is. In the future this, if left natural would be a wonderful park in the middle of metropolis. Even without the proposed commercial development it going to move the coyotes and snakes further into the areas with homes.

  6. Tina Mare Fortuna

    March 30, 2017 at 10:13 AM

    I would like to see the Forrest stay in its present condition. No development of any kind. A&M haa has resources to find alternate sites for growth. Please leave our forrest intact and completely natural without any additial building or clearing of ANY kind